On Krugman and Unemployment Compensation
:[ March 14th, 2010Paul Krugman is currently claiming that Republicans are wrong about the effect of unemployment insurance on the rate of employment, namely that extending unemployment compensation increases the unemployment rate.
This goes counter to both common sense and what Krugman himself (along with his wife, also an economist) wrote in his textbook, Macroeconomics:
Public policy designed to help workers who lose their jobs can lead to structural unemployment as an unintended side effect. . . . In other countries, particularly in Europe, benefits are more generous and last longer. The drawback to this generosity is that it reduces a worker’s incentive to quickly find a new job. Generous unemployment benefits in some European countries are widely believed to be one of the main causes of “Eurosclerosis,” the persistent high unemployment that affects a number of European countries.
In unemployment compensation, you’ve got a system in which you’re paying people to not work. The marginal increase that they get to return to work is much lower than it would be if they weren’t receiving unemployment compensation. If you’re receiving $400/week to not work, would you take a full-time job that pays $10(or less) per hour? Not likely, even if that were the only job offer you had. What if the job paid $12/hour? Effectively, you’d be working 40 hours per week for an additional $80(before taxes). There are a lot of people who won’t take that tradeoff…$400 to do whatever I want all week, or $480 to bust my butt for 40 hours per week? Some people would value that extra leisure time even more than that. They may not go back to work even for $18/hour, so long as they’re already getting paid.
And that’s only the people who are looking at a tradeoff between more income and leisure time. I’m sure there are some people collecting unemployment compensation right now who have no intention of going back to work in the near future. Some have gone back to school, some will become stay-at-home parents, some will retire. But, hey, why acknowledge those truths now, if claiming to be looking for work will get you “free money”?
It’s only common sense that extending benefits will lead to an overall increase in unemployment, as we currently measure it. Paul Krugman used to have common sense. He’s since adopted the left’s lack thereof.
